The word "CHINA" over a red background with the H making a factory producing gas into the air

China’s energy policies require integrated, strategic approach to balance air quality, carbon emissions and water scarcity goals

By
B. Rose Kelly, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
on Sept. 14, 2018, 11:35 a.m.
Image by
Egan Jimenez, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs

Committed to addressing the country’s severe air pollution, China is attempting a shift from coal to natural gas and is considering a variety of sources, including domestic and imported gas options as well as creating its own synthetic gas from coal.  

A team of researchers led by Princeton University investigated the environmental impacts of transitioning from coal to natural gas in China, exploring implications on air quality, carbon mitigation and water stress by the year 2020.

The findings, published in Nature Sustainability, warn that the use of coal-based synthetic natural gas, known by the acronym “SNG,” would increase carbon emissions and water demand, especially in regions in China that already have high per capita carbon emissions and water scarcity.  

Overall, the researchers find that a switch from coal to other natural gas types does produce air, carbon and water co-benefits when methane leakage, a powerful greenhouse gas, is well controlled. However, there are trade-offs when it comes to degree of improvements for air quality and water scarcity — depending in which sector the natural gas is used to substitute for coal and where that substitution takes place. 

The paper is among the first to analyze the interactions between air quality, carbon emissions and water use in both energy production and consumption. The paper highlights the need for an integrated, strategic approach when reshaping energy systems.
“Assessing air quality, carbon emissions and water scarcity impacts across local, regional and global levels is crucial to capturing potential co-benefits while avoiding unintended consequences,” said study first author Yue Qin, who conducted the research as a doctoral candidate at Princeton. She is now a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California-Irvine.

“Although there is a lot of discussion on the need for a clean energy supply transition, in what sector the clean energy is used and what it is displacing is also critical in determining air quality, carbon and water co-benefits,” said study principal investigator Denise Mauzerall, professor of civil and environmental engineering and public and international affairs at Princeton’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and the School of Engineering and Applied Science. “While the paper focuses on China, its general conclusions are widely applicable.”

Study co-authors included Wei Peng, who conducted the research at Princeton and is now at Harvard University; Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Edward Byers and Fabian Wagner, all from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; and Kuishuang Feng, based at the University of Maryland.

The researchers set out to analyze the relationship between the energy industry and its effects on air quality, carbon and water. These environmental issues are frequently addressed individually, but the energy sector affects each of these areas in distinct ways and energy policies can either bring co-benefits or disbenefits.

China became the case study because of its plans to reduce its dependence on coal and transition, in part, to natural gas as a way to improve air quality. The authors were interested in the broader environmental implications of this move, which has global implications for sustainable development.

Today, China accounts for more than half of the world’s coal consumption. Natural gas — the cleanest fossil fuel — accounts for only 6 percent of China’s primary energy consumption, against a global average of approximately 16 percent. The global average has been steadily rising about 15 percent every year since 2000.

To understand the environmental impacts of a coal-to-natural-gas switch, the researchers combined an energy production/use lifecycle analysis, which charts a product’s life from start to finish, with an integrated environmental impact assessment.

For each of six major gas sources, they examined the impacts of substituting coal with a fixed amount of additional natural gas on resulting air quality improvements, carbon mitigation and water stress across China.

The gas sources were chosen based on government and industrial plans for 2020 and included conventional gas, synthetic natural gas, shale gas, imported liquified natural gas, imported Eastern Russia gas and imported Central Asia gas.

The researchers identified air, carbon and water as their “environmental targets” because of the global and national interest in these areas. Also, the simultaneous examination of these three areas could help avoid severe, unintended environmental consequences.

The researchers found that, except for coal-based synthetic natural gas, replacing coal with natural gas generally has benefits for air quality, carbon mitigation and water stress.

Depending on the gas source type and how it will be used, switching from coal to gas sources (other than synthetic natural gas) leads to substantial CO2 emission reductions as well as reductions in water use. Reductions of 60-120 million metric tons of CO2 could be seen, which is equivalent to the national total of CO2  emissions in the Philippines. In terms of water, reductions of 20 to 60 million cubic meters is possible when substituting 30 billion cubic meters of gas for coal.

But coal-based synthetic natural gas is another story. Synthetic natural gas increases carbon emissions and water consumption in China’s northwestern provinces, which already suffer from high per capita carbon emissions and severe water scarcity.

“Importantly, as the regions with high air pollution do not overlap with regions with high water stress, and substitution in different sectors bring different levels of air quality and water impacts, there are trade-offs in the magnitude of air quality and water improvements,” Qin said.

Overall, the gas source affects air quality, carbon and water in different ways depending on how it’s used.

“Our findings show why it is critical to understand the underlying air-carbon-water synergies and trade-offs so that China, as well as other developing countries, can properly design clean energy transition pathways according to their local environmental priorities,” Qin said.

“The development of new energy systems provides an opportunity to simultaneously reduce  multiple environmental impacts including domestic air pollution, local water scarcity and global climate change,” Mauzerall said. “Ultimately, a full transition away from carbon-based fuels will be necessary to address climate change. In other research we have found that renewable energy provides the largest co-benefits for air quality, carbon mitigation and reduced water consumption of any known energy sources.”

Qin thanks the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University for her graduate fellowship as well as the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis for her 2016 Young Scientists Summer Program fellowship.

The paper, “Air Quality-Carbon-Water Synergies and Trade-offs in China’s Natural Gas Industry,” appeared online Sept. 14 in Nature Sustainability.

Related Stories

Synthetic gas would cut air pollution but worsen climate damage in China .

China's smog has created a public health crisis that has led the Chinese government to declare a war on air pollution. In addition, as part of the Paris climate agreements, China has committed to peaking its CO2 emissions by 2030 or sooner. A new study led by researchers at Princeton University analyzes a conflict between these goals in China's plans to use synthetic natural gas, a fuel derived from coal that is relatively free of conventional air pollutants but the production of which increases emissions of carbon dioxide, relative to direct coal combustion.

Household fuels exceed power plants and cars as source of smog in Beijing .

New research indicates that the Chinese government could dramatically improve air quality in and around Beijing with more attention to an overlooked source of outdoor pollution — residential cooking and heating.

Andlinger Center Speaks: U.S. carbon dioxide emissions rise by 3.4 percent .

Increased electricity demand and economic growth are among the contributing factors to the rise in carbon emissions of 3.4 percent in the past year. Experts Judi Greenwald, Eric Larson and Michael Oppenheimer at Princeton's Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment discussed the trend.

Dual focus on the environment: Mauzerall connects climate change, pollution in search for solutions .

In her research and teaching, Princeton Professor Denise Mauzerall employs both scientific and regulatory perspectives in analyzing the effects of air pollution on climate change, human health and agricultural production. She has emerged as a leader in efforts to track the flow of pollution through atmospheric models, helping to identify where reductions of harmful emissions would have the largest benefit.

Controlling methane is a fast and critical way to slow global warming, say Princeton experts .

In independent studies, two Princeton University research teams recently identified surprisingly large sources of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, being leaked into the atmosphere. Pound for pound, methane causes a far greater warming effect in the atmosphere than does carbon dioxide — 86-fold more heating over 20 years, and 35-fold more over the course of a century.

Study: Methane emission controls can save thousands of lives .

Reducing methane emissions from industrial operations and other human activities can help save thousands of lives over the next three decades by diminishing global air pollution, according to a study by Princeton researchers.

Rapid Switch project to assess practicality and pace of global climate strategies .

Princeton University convened an international research team June 11-13 to begin a five-year effort, called Rapid Switch, to frame a realistic global response to climate change that accounts for massive economic development in countries, including India and China.