Event details
Feb
6
Political Philosophy Colloquium: The political theory of venality in the ancien régime
Political Philosophy Colloquium
The political theory of venality in the ancien régime
One of the most notorious features of the French ancien régime was the practice of venality of office -- that is, the buying and selling of state offices that often served as a ticket into the hereditary nobility. To later historians, venality epitomized the irrational state structures that led to the eventual collapse of the French monarchy, but already in the eighteenth century it was denounced by everyone from aristocratic reactionaries to enlightened reformers. The most notable defender of the practice, however, was also by consensus the greatest French political theorist of the century, Montesquieu. His treatment of venality is especially notable because it does not offer a "conservative" defense of the practice as an inheritance of the pre-commercial past. On the contrary, Montesquieu views venality as a mechanism especially well-adapted to modern commercial society, and the logic he lays out might not be entirely irrelevant to contemporary liberal capitalist societies.
Daniel Luban is an assistant professor of political science at Columbia. He is finishing a book on early modern social theory entitled Children of Pride, from which the present talk is drawn.
The political theory of venality in the ancien régime
One of the most notorious features of the French ancien régime was the practice of venality of office -- that is, the buying and selling of state offices that often served as a ticket into the hereditary nobility. To later historians, venality epitomized the irrational state structures that led to the eventual collapse of the French monarchy, but already in the eighteenth century it was denounced by everyone from aristocratic reactionaries to enlightened reformers. The most notable defender of the practice, however, was also by consensus the greatest French political theorist of the century, Montesquieu. His treatment of venality is especially notable because it does not offer a "conservative" defense of the practice as an inheritance of the pre-commercial past. On the contrary, Montesquieu views venality as a mechanism especially well-adapted to modern commercial society, and the logic he lays out might not be entirely irrelevant to contemporary liberal capitalist societies.
Daniel Luban is an assistant professor of political science at Columbia. He is finishing a book on early modern social theory entitled Children of Pride, from which the present talk is drawn.
Speakers
Daniel Luban, Columbia University
Sponsorship of an event does not constitute institutional endorsement of external speakers or views presented.
Date
February 6, 2025Time
4:30 p.m.Location
Corwin Hall, 127Audience
University Sponsors
University Center for Human Values
Department of Politics