Hans Halvorson

Halvorson, H. (2023). Carnap’s formal philosophy of science. In C. Damböck & G. Schiemer (Eds.), Rudolf Carnap Handbuch. Metzler Verlag.
Halvorson, H. (2023). On theories: Logical empiricism and the methodology of modern physics, by William Demopoulos. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 2022. Pp. Xxiv + 247. Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzac065
Halvorson, H. (2023). The philosophy of science in Either-Or. In R. Kemp & W. Wietzke (Eds.), Kierkegaard’s Either-Or (pp. 153–170). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067713.010
Halvorson, H. (2023). What philosophy of science has to offer to theology. Philosophy, Theology, and the Sciences, 10, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1628/ptsc-2023-0009
Halvorson, H., & Butterfield, J. (2023). John Bell on “subject and object”: An exchange. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 54(2), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-021-09594-y
Halvorson, H., & Jacobsen, A. S. (2023). Niels Bohr og den danske filosofiske tradition. In J. L. og Helle Porsdam (Ed.), Vitenskap, menneskerettigheter og diplomati: Fridtjof Nansen og Niels Bohr (pp. 245–264). Novus Forlag.
Barrett, T. W., & Halvorson, H. (2022). Mutual translatability, equivalence, and the structure of theories. Synthese, 200(3), 240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03733-8
Halvorson, H. (2022). Objective description in physics. In T. Marvan, H. Andersen, B. Löwe, & H. Chang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science and technology (pp. 111–132). College Publications. https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/lmps/?00017
Halvorson, H., & Manchak, J. B. (2022). Closing the hole argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1086/719193
Halvorson, H. (2021). Steven French: There are no such things as theories: Oxford University Press: Oxford 2020, 288 pp. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 52(4), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-021-09573-3
Halvorson, H. (2020). Concluding unscientific image. Metascience, 29, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00506-2
Halvorson, H. (2020). How logic works: A user’s guide. Princeton University Press.
Halvorson, H. (2019). The logic in philosophy of science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275603
Halvorson, H. (2019). To be a realist about quantum theory. In O. Lombardi (Ed.), Quantum worlds: Perspectives on the ontology of quantum mechanics (pp. 133–163). Cambridge University Press.
Briggs, A., Halvorson, H., & Steane, A. M. (2018). It keeps me seeking: The invitation from science, philosophy, and religion. Oxford University Press, USA.
Halvorson, H. (2018). A theological critique of the fine-tuning argument. In M. A. Benton, J. Hawthorne, & D. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Knowledge, belief, and God: New insights in religious epistemology (pp. 122–135). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198798705.003.0007
Halvorson, H., & Tsementzis, D. (2018). Categories of scientific theories. In E. Landry (Ed.), Categories for the working philosopher. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198748991.003.0017
Ozawa, M., Butterfield, J., Halvorson, H., Rédei, M., Kitajima, Y., & Buscemi, F. (Eds.). (2018). Reality and measurement in algebraic quantum theory (Vol. 261). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2487-1
Tsementzis, D., & Halvorson, H. (2018). Foundations and philosophy. Philosophers Imprint, 18. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0018.010
Barrett, T. W., & Halvorson, H. (2017). From geometry to conceptual relativity. Erkenntnis, 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9858-y
Barrett, T. W., & Halvorson, H. (2017). Quine’s conjecture on many-sorted logic. Synthese, 194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1107-z
Barrett, T. W., & Halvorson, H. (2016). Glymour and Quine on theoretical equivalence. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9382-6
Barrett, T. W., & Halvorson, H. (2016). Morita equivalence. Review of Symbolic Logic, 9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020316000186
Halvorson, H. (2016). Scientific theories. In P. Humphreys (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of science (pp. 585–608). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199368815.013.33
Halvorson, H. (2016). Why methodological naturalism? In The Blackwell companion to naturalism. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118657775.ch10
Baker, D. J., Halvorson, H., & Swanson, N. (2015). The conventionality of parastatistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu018
Baker, D. J., & Halvorson, H. (2013). How is spontaneous symmetry breaking possible? Understanding Wigner’s theorem in light of unitary inequivalence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44(4), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.09.005
Halvorson, H. (2013). Plantinga on providence and physics. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 5. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v5i3.216
Halvorson, H. (2012). What scientific theories could not be. Philosophy of Science, 79(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/664745
Halvorson, H., & Kragh, H. (2012). Physical cosmology. In The routledge companion to Theism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123294
Halvorson, H. (2011). Deep beauty: Understanding the quantum world through mathematical innovation. Cambrdige University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976971
Halvorson, H. (2011). The measure of all things: Quantum mechanics and the soul. In M. C. Baker & S. Goetz (Eds.), The soul hypothesis: Investigations into the existence of the soul (p. 138). Continuum Press.
Baker, D. J., & Halvorson, H. (2010). Antimatter. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp009
Halvorson, H., & Mueger, M. (2006). Algebraic quantum field theory. In J. Butterfield & J. Earman (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of physics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50011-7
Halvorson, H. (2004). Complementarity of representations in quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2003.01.001
Halvorson, H. (2004). On information-theoretic characterizations of physical theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.02.001
Halvorson, H. (2004). Remote preparation of arbitrary ensembles and quantum bit commitment. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 45(12), 4920–4931. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1812827
Clifton, R., Bub, J., & Halvorson, H. (2002). Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints. Foundations of Physics, 33(11), 1561–1591. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026056716397
Halvorson, H., & Clifton, R. (2002). No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories? Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/338939
Halvorson, H., & Clifton, R. (2002). Reconsidering Bohr’s reply to EPR. In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (Eds.), Non-locality and modality (pp. 3–18). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0385-8_1
Clifton, R., & Halvorson, H. (2001). Are Rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/52.3.417
Clifton, R., & Halvorson, H. (2001). Entanglement and open systems in algebraic quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1355-2198(00)00033-2
Halvorson, H. (2001). On the nature of continuous physical quantities in classical and quantum mechanics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 30(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017574203443
Halvorson, H. (2001). Reeh-Schlieder defeats Newton-Wigner: On alternative localization schemes in relativistic quantum field theory. Philosophy of Science, 68. https://doi.org/10.1086/392869
Clifton, R., Halvorson, H., & Kent, A. (2000). Nonlocal correlations are generic in infinite-dimensional bipartite systems. Physical Review A, 61. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.042101
Halvorson, H. (2000). The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen state maximally violates Bell’s inequalities. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007609031556
Halvorson, H., & Clifton, R. (2000). Generic Bell correlation between arbitrary local algebras in quantum field theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 41(4), 1711–1717. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.533253
Halvorson, H., & Clifton, R. (1999). Maximal beable subalgebras of quantum mechanical observables. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026628407645
Clifton, R., Feldman, D. V., Halvorson, H., Redhead, M. L. G., & Wilce, A. (1998). Superentangled states. Physical Review A, 58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.135