May 16, 2001:
Features
Centuries of different
planners formed and changed Princeton's layout
by Ben Kessler
At last year's Reunions,
a forum entitled "The Look of Princeton" was convened
to assess the current state of campus architecture. The panel consisted
of architectural professionals representing six different decades
of Princeton education, a lengthy period marked by significant shifts
in theoretical canons and stylistic trends. It was remarkable, then,
that each and every participant tended to agree on one salient point:
The ambience of the campus was shaped as much by the spaces nestled
in between and around the buildings as by the buildings themselves.
The history of the Princeton
campus may be interpreted as the evolution of a spatial entity in
a changing relationship with the immediate community and, by extension,
with the world beyond. This development has been characterized by
two conflicting impulses: the need to maintain the sense of order
and containment inherent in the campus's earliest forms, and the
imperative of expansive, organic growth. Over time, as the campus
consumed more and more acres, growth naturally prevailed. Order
could be implied in later years only by subtle or symbolic means.
Space itself has always
been a Princeton luxury. When, in 1753, the trustees of the College
of New Jersey sought for the school's permanent home a site more
central to the colony and more salubrious than Newark, they also
happened to choose a location with plenty of room to grow. While
the original parcel of land donated by Nathaniel FitzRandolph is
minuscule in comparison with today's campus, the rural setting of
Princeton, which, at the time, was hardly more than a dusty stagecoach
stop on the King's Highway between New York and Philadelphia, ensured
breathing space for generations to come. Yale, by contrast, was
early on locked into the incipient urban grid of New Haven; its
original campus, by necessity, has been cannibalized over the years
by successive rebuilding campaigns.
The
original Nassau Hall, depicted in a 1764 print, comprised the entire
college; only the president had his own home (today Maclean House),
at right.
Nassau Hall, completed
in 1756, is said to have been the largest stone building in the
colonies of its day. Perched on the height of land on which the
modern town now sits, it must be imagined without any surrounding
structures or, for that matter, trees, as most of the land was then
cleared for agriculture. Rising above the surrounding fields, it
must have been an astounding sight, utterly dominating the landscape.
There was no campus to speak of -- just the huge, solitary edifice,
entirely out of scale with the small village it faced. Every function
of the college -- classroom, dormitory, chapel, library, and refectory
-- was housed under its roof. Only the president had a home of his
own, today's Maclean House, present quarters of the Alumni Council.
Notwithstanding the depredations
of the American Revolution, the college remained the same throughout
the 18th century. In 1802, however, disaster struck when a fire
gutted the interior of Nassau Hall. The rebuilding effort occasioned
the putting up of two smaller, flanking structures. These new buildings,
which contained classrooms, a small library, and a dining hall,
became known as Philosophical and Geological Halls. Philosophical
Hall was razed in 1870 to make way for the Chancellor Green Library,
but Geological Hall survives today as Stanhope Hall.
A
primitive drawing from circa 1825 (page 25) shows an ensemble of
buildings grouped around what we now call the Front Campus, with
Nassau Hall in the middle, Philosophical and Geological Halls to
either side, and faculty houses, no longer extant, in between. The
President's House, on the far right, is mirrored on the left by
what was known as the Vice-President's House (this is not to be
confused with the Joseph Henry House, which was moved to its current
location in 1946). The axial symmetry of the arrangement reflects
the classical ideals and measured rationality of the Enlightenment
thinking that guided the college in its early years. The tableau
presented a self-contained scholarly community, a humbler version
of Thomas Jefferson's "Academic Village" that rose contemporaneously
at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. If only reality
had conformed to this model; this period is generally considered
to be Princeton's lowest ebb, marked by shrinking enrollments and
serious disciplinary problems.
In the 1830s, the campus
expanded southward. After many years of housing students in the
dank basement of Nassau Hall, two dormitories were constructed on
either side of what was the college's backyard. These became known
as East and West College. Around this time, members of the rival
American Whig and Cliosophic debating societies, which existed uncomfortably
in cramped offices in Geological Hall, decided to build new lodgings.
They enlisted the aid of Joseph Henry, first in a long line of eminent
physicists to teach at Princeton, to help plan the new site.
In 1836, Henry devised
what essentially became the first master plan for the college. Behind
Nassau Hall, he situated a quadrangle, today's Cannon Green, incorporating
the recently built dormitories along the sides and placing the intended
Whig and Clio Halls at the far end, along sight lines on either
side of Nassau Hall. Henry suggested the space between the two debating
halls as the site for a future chapel. The plan formed an extension
of the axial rationality of the Front Campus and symbolically represented
the division of functions of the college, with the seat of secular
learning, Nassau Hall, and the seat of religious learning, the proposed
chapel, on opposite sides of the green.
As it happened, a chapel
was raised in 1847, not on the site recommended by Henry, but next
to Nassau Hall, at the spot now occupied by the "hyphen"
between Chancellor Green and East Pyne. The space between Whig and
Clio was put to an entirely different purpose, when, after a rash
of wooden outhouse fires, a more permanent sanitary facility was
built in 1861. The small, sunken plaza, lined with individual privies
between square granite pillars, was almost immediately dubbed the
Cloaca Maxima, after the sewer system of ancient Rome. For several
years, this prosaic feature marked the southern edge of campus.
When James McCosh, esteemed
Scottish philosopher and theologian, crossed the Atlantic in 1868
to become 11th president of the college, he found a campus neatly
encapsulated in the rectangular confines of the Front and Rear Campuses.
Only a new observatory (1865) and some service buildings existed
beyond these bounds. McCosh also found a somewhat provincial institution
with a hidebound course of study. His 20-year presidency ushered
in an era of modernization in which a rapidly expanding curriculum
embraced the arts and sciences -- a transformation of educational
mission that resulted in an ambitious building program.
The
train station at Blair Arch (1896): For decades this was the functional
entrance to the campus.
An aerial perspective
made in 1875 indicates the extent to which new construction had
changed the shape of the campus. To the west, two dormitories, Reunion
and Witherspoon Halls, and the Bonner-Marquand Gymnasium have been
added. In the other direction, along Nassau Street, a new academic
complex has risen, including the John C. Green School of Science,
the classroom building Dickinson Hall, and the Chancellor Green
Library. The replacement of Philosophical Hall by Chancellor Green
broke the original symmetry of the Front Campus, which was effectively
elongated eastward, in a very public display of institutional growth.
None of this sense of openness to the world is evident today: The
School of Science and Dickinson Hall succumbed to fires in the 1920s
and were replaced eventually by the forbidding back side of Firestone
Library (1946-48), while Chancellor Green, clearly meant to be seen
from Nassau Street, was occluded by the insertion of the Joseph
Henry House.
As enrollment increased
during the McCosh era, three new dormitories were built in a line
stretching southeast from Witherspoon: Edwards Hall, Dod Hall, and
Brown Hall. These buildings formed a diagonal progression that conformed
not with the established axial layout of the Rear Campus, but with
the natural contour of the land, following a slope of high ground.
McCosh's attitudes toward architecture are not particularly documented,
but he expressly stated his interest in laying out the expanding
campus along the picturesque lines of an English nobleman's park.
That is, he favored an emphasis on varied and irregular forms rather
than geometric linearity. Thus, as the college grew in the latter
part of the 19th century, the unified rationality of the earlier
plan gave way to a freer-flowing
design in which each new building expressed its individuality in
an eclectic profusion of historical styles. McCosh may have drawn
inspiration from Prospect House, which, originally built as a private
residence, was purchased by the college to be the president's home
in 1878. The asymmetrical eccentricity of its profile might serve
as a leitmotiv for the idiosyncratic development of the campus in
this era.
The campus was also shaped
in this period by the coming of the railroad. In 1865, a spur was
built from the main trunk line between Philadelphia and Jersey City.
Until 1918, when it was removed to its present location, a railway
station of one form or another existed directly adjacent to the
campus, just below the western edge of the high ground upon which
the school was situated. If the formal entrance to the college was
the Front Campus, then the functional entrance, for several generations,
was the station at the foot of the hill. This fact was accentuated
in 1896, when a new dormitory, Blair Hall, was built above a preexisting
stairway that ascended from the railway platform. The archway piercing
Blair's massive, crenellated tower formed a monumental gateway to
the college, renamed Princeton University in that year.
Blair Hall was soon joined
by Little Hall and University Gymnasium, all designed by the architects
Walter Cope and John Stewardson to create an ensemble that meandered
along the edge of the railway. Military in bearing, this sequence
of structures formed an undulating escarpment of gray stone that
dramatically redefined the western boundary of the campus. Consciously
emulating the Tudor Gothic of Oxford and Cambridge (and realistically
addressing the problem of facing a rail yard), the architects emphasized
a sense of enclosure, an inward turning that would influence the
layout of campus construction for years to come.
The legacy of Cope and
Stewardson, whose careers were both cut short by untimely death,
was carried on by Ralph Adams Cram, the foremost Gothic Revival
practitioner in America. In his capacity as supervising architect
for the university (1908-31), Cram promulgated what became known
as Collegiate Gothic as an institutional style. Cram arrived at
Princeton when the school was embroiled in controversy over the
siting of the new Graduate College. Woodrow Wilson, president at
the time, favored placing the graduate school in the midst of campus
as a potential salutary influence on the undergraduate population.
Had Wilson had his way, the graduate school would have existed on
the eastern side of campus, roughly where the School of Architecture
and the Woolworth Music Building stand today. But Wilson was opposed
by the head of the Graduate College, Andrew Fleming West, who, mindful
of his prerogative as dean, favored a separate, more isolated location.
West eventually prevailed, and Cram was put to work designing the
complex, a mini-campus in its own right, that rises over the Springdale
Golf Course.
Cram was a fervent champion
of formal unity; the eclectic hodge-podge left over from the McCosh-era
expansion offended his aesthetic sensibility. He wrote about these
buildings: "The principle of rugged individualism had run riot
for years and the result was confusion confounded." Cram formulated
a master plan for the campus, published in PAW in 1908, that was
intended to restore compositional order to this perceived disarray.
Incorporating preexisting structures into a new, presumably Collegiate
Gothic fabric, Cram's plan unfolded as a series of linked cloisters.
The layout particularly suited Woodrow Wilson's ideal -- his
so-called Quad Plan -- of integrating students and faculty in
small communities modeled after the residential colleges of Oxford
and Cambridge. Wilson's concept never took hold, at least not until
the advent of residential colleges in the 1980s. But the interwoven
pockets of space suggested by Cram became a hallmark of life at
Princeton in the 20th century.
For all his Gothic predilections,
Cram was a Beaux-Arts classicist at heart. His design was anchored
around a bold axis leading south from Nassau Hall -- a reinvigoration,
in spirit, of the Henry Plan -- that broadened into a grand promenade.
As proposed, the plan necessitated the removal of Dod Hall, which
ruined the symmetry of the scheme. Cram's great axis was not realized
(and probably just as well, as it would have constrained everything
else that followed), but his influence on the shape of the campus
cannot be underestimated. During his tenure as super-visor a host
of new buildings went up, mostly designed by other architectural
firms, but following the general precepts of Cram's vision. He succeeded
in moving the railroad station to its current location and filling
the vacated area in the 1920s with the dormitories that line University
Place. Decorated with plantings by the renowned landscape architect
Beatrix Farrand, this residential cluster, sarcastically known today
as the "Junior Slums," is actually one of the handsomest
spots on campus.
Throughout the 20th century
and especially after World War II, the campus spilled down the hill
toward Lake Carnegie and eastward across Washington Road, following
no guiding principle save the logistics of agglomeration. To some
extent, the motif of small, enclosed spaces was maintained. Even
the unprepossessing New Quads of the 1950s and 1960s, now home to
Wilson and Butler Colleges, were based on this idea. But some of
the more ambitious postwar architectural projects, such as the Woodrow
Wilson School's Robertson Hall, or the Jadwin-Fine science complex,
tended to occupy space rather than enliven it. The design of the
Spelman dormitories, specifically meant to emphasize the diagonal
axis leading to the Dinky Station, managed, despite its geometric
rationale, to reduce this crucial passageway to the status of a
tenement back alley, thus defeating the original spatial intent.
Clearly, another era of rugged individualism was afoot without much
regard for the "big picture."
In recent years, however,
concern for the overall shape of the campus has reemerged. The architectural
firm of Machado and Silvetti was commissioned in 1996 to compose
a strategic master plan. Many of the principles suggested in the
plan have been adopted by the university and some of the prescriptive
steps have now begun to take shape. Among other issues, the plan
recognized the importance of reorganizing the southern periphery
of the campus, which hitherto had been a haphazard edge determined
by wherever the last construction stopped. As more and more visitors
approach the campus by automobile, this aspect has become one's
first impression while heading along Elm Drive from Faculty Road.
Machado and Silvetti projected for this spot a semicircle of buildings
that would partially envelop existing athletic fields. Although
the resulting construction has not taken the strict elliptical shape
proposed in the plan, the general concept is being followed. Scully
Hall, a dormitory designed by the authors of the plan, is the first
and central piece of the arrangement. To the east, ground has been
broken for the building that will house the Lewis-Sigler Institute
for Integrative Genomics, designed by Rafael Viñoly (who
also designed Princeton Stadium). To the west, a dormitory complex
will rise, completing the hemicycle.
The master plan proposes
reinforced sight lines along traditional thoroughfares, extending
McCosh Walk to the East Campus, connecting Goheen Walk on
the south side of campus
with the Dinky Station, and establishing a series of crosswalk plazas
along Washington Road. Even Cram's axis south of Nassau Hall may
be revived, albeit on a much more modest scale, with new paving
and landscaping. The plan
also projects long-term growth on the other side of Lake Carnegie,
with proposed zoning for academic, residential, and athletic facilities
reaching almost to Route 1. The Princeton campus is becoming inexorably
larger, but, as the legacy of Princeton planners shows, the inherent
disorder of rampant growth can be controlled to a reasonable extent
under the aegis of well-conceived planning.
Ben Kessler is director
of slide and photography collections in the art and archaeology
department.
On the Web
Evolution of the Campus:
http://mondrian.princeton.edu:80/Campus/navigate_start.html
|