A Defense of Free Speech From Its Progressive — and Conservative — Critics
Progressives have increasingly lost faith in the First Amendment—at least as it has been interpreted and applied by the Supreme Court. They argue that free speech has been “weaponized” by big business as a deregulatory tool; that hate speech inflicts harms that warrant its regulation; that free speech is obsolete in the internet age; and that it subjects campaign finance regulation to unjustified judicial scrutiny. Each of these criticisms is widely shared in the legal academy, often taken as given.
These lectures will offer a defense of the First Amendment from its progressive critics. I am a progressive myself. But I will argue that the progressive case against the First Amendment, while offering important insights, is not just unpersuasive, but counterproductive. I seek to offer in short, a progressive defense to the progressive critics of free speech today.
Lecture I: Free Speech, Neutrality, and Civil Rights
In the first lecture, David Cole will focus on laying out an affirmative conception of free speech, defending a strong version of content and viewpoint neutrality, and respond to progressive criticisms that this has impermissibly interfered with or undermined equality commitments.
Speaker:
David D. Cole, Georgetown University Law Center
David D. Cole is the Hon. George J. Mitchell Professor in Law and Public Policy at Georgetown University Law Center and former National Legal Director of the ACLU. He writes regularly for the New York Review of Books and is legal affairs correspondent for The Nation. He is the author or editor of ten books, including No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System, and Engines of Liberty: How Citizen Movements Succeed.
David has litigated many pathbreaking cases in the Supreme Court, including Texas v. Johnson, which extended First Amendment protection to flag burning; Bostock v. Clayton County, which established that Title VII bans discrimination on the basis of transgender status and sexual orientation; and National Rifle Association v. Vullo, which held that government officials cannot use their regulatory authority to coerce private parties into blacklisting a disfavored political organization. He has received many awards for his civil liberties work.
Commentators:
Catharine A. MacKinnon, is the Elizabeth A. Long Professor Emerita of Law at Michigan Law and the long-term James Barr Ames Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School
Joshua Cohen, Faculty Senior Director, Apple University
Speakers
David D. Cole
University programs and activities are open to all eligible participants without regard to identity or other protected characteristics. Sponsorship of an event does not constitute institutional endorsement of external speakers or views presented.
View physical accessibility information for campus buildings and find accessible routes using the Princeton Campus Map app.
Date
November 12, 2025Time
4:30 p.m.Location
Friend Center, 101Audience
University Sponsors
University Center for Human Values
External Sponsors
Department of Anthropology
Department of Comparative Literature
Department of Philosophy
Department of Politics
Department of Sociology
James Madison Program
Princeton Public Lectures
Princeton School of Public and International Affairs
Princeton University Humanities Council
Program in Law and Normative Thinking
Program in Law and Public Policy