Ancient and modern buildings generally have symmetrically disposed, decorative,
supporting columns at their entrances, as may be seen at Whig Hall and the School of
Engineering (below). These can be pleasing, functional, and unobtrusive.
However, the architect of Bowen Hall (below right, 1992) chose to employ a single,
offset column (not to mention a single, offset bannister) at the main entrance instead.
What could be the reason for this anomaly? Do architects really believe that this
"new" feature adds "tension" to the design? When introduced perhaps 150 years ago,
that might have been the case, but since the advent of steel frame construction,
this motif has been used so many times that it ceased to be anything but trite.
No modern observer can possibly think that such porticos are in any way "risky".
They are just ugly, and hint of inappropriate cost cutting (common enough at Princeton!).
Moreover, the Bowen Hall asymmetric portico was not even a novelty on the Princeton
campus. The Caldwell Field House (1963) introduced this feature with uncharacteristic
subtlety: its REAR entrance is "supported" by a single steel column (below left).
That this shaft is not a gutter or an exposed steam duct is evident from the main
entrance (below bottom), where similar columns are used in a more traditional manner.