Web Exclusives: More
February 21, 2001:
Endowment Spending Policy Fact Sheet
(January 2001)
Objective
The primary objective of Princeton's endowment
spending policy is to achieve a proper balance between present and
future needs of the University. Other objectives are to achieve
a reasonable degree of stability and predictability in income available
for current operations and to insulate the University's investment
managers from any pressure to produce short-term gains as opposed
to achieving the best total return over the longer term.
Princeton's Policy: A spending Rule
Princeton adopted its current policy in 1979. It
is based on a spending rule. The rule says that the amount of spending
per unit of endowment will increase each year by a stipulated percentage.
(The endowment can be thought of as a mutual fund in which each
endowed program owns a certain number of units.) Currently the annual
increase is 5% per year. This means that regardless of a year's
market performance or how much of a year's earnings take the form
of dividends, interest, or capital appreciation, the amount of spending
per unit of endowment each year will be 5% more than the previous
year. (The total amount of endowment spending also is affected by
new gifts, which create new units of endowment.)
The Spending Rate
Applying this rule results, each year, in a spending
rate, defined as the amount of endowment spending divided by the
overall endowment value. While Princeton's policy does not establish
an explicit spending rate -- it results from the application of
the spending rule and fluctuations over time in the value of the
endowment -- the University has long thought that a spending rate
between 4% and 5% of the market value of the endowment was desirable
and appropriate.
Relationship Between "Rule" and "Rate"
The spending rule is based on two key assumptions:
(1) that the University's inflation rate over time will likely average
about 5% and (2) that the total return on the University's endowment
over time will likely average between 9% and 10%. If total return
averages between 9% and 10% and endowment spending increases each
year by 5% (as the "rule" stipulates), the spending "rate"
would be between 4% and 5%. In this idealized world, the University
would be earning between 9% and 10% on its endowment; it would be
spending between 4% and 5% of the value of its endowment each year
on current operations; and it would be reinvesting 5% each year
to pay for the next year's increase in spending and thereby preserve
the purchasing power of the endowment into the future.
Periodic Adjustments
Although the only number in this equation established
by policy (the spending rule) is the 5% annual increase in spending
per unit of endowment, the trustees periodically have reviewed the
actual spending rate to see whether it is falling in the range of
4%-5%. Since the current rule was adopted in 1979, the trustees
have made several upward adjustments in spending after higher-than-expected
total returns on the endowment pushed the spending rate below that
range. While the rate changes daily as the value of the endowment
fluctuates, the recent spending rate has been in the range of 3-3.5%.
Calculating the Rate
In calculating its spending rate (endowment spending
divided by endowment value), the University includes only its primary
investment pool (currently over $6 billion). This excludes the separately
invested Robertson Foundation funds that support the graduate program
of the Woodrow Wilson School, funds invested for the short-term
(for example, funds waiting to be spent on major construction projects),
and a variety of other very restricted or special purpose investments
(such as loans to parents, faculty or staff).
Previous Adjustments
This year's adjustment is the sixth since the current
policy was adopted in 1979. In 1982, the annual percentage increase
was changed from its original 6% to 8%. In 1986, the annual percentage
increase was reduced to 7%, but an upward adjustment was made in
the amount of spending to increase the spending rate to roughly
4.5%. (Because of superior investment performance, it had fallen
below 3.5%.) Any increase in spending affects both restricted accounts
(such as library acquisitions and certain academic programs) and
funds for discretionary allocation. (This year's $57 million increase
in spending provides an additional $16 million to restricted accounts
and $41 million for discretionary allocation.) The discretionary
portions of the three adjustments in the 1990s were all targeted
toward recurring capital needs:
1991: The annual percentage increase was reduced
to 6% while spending available for discretionary allocation was
adjusted upward by approximately $9 million. These funds were used
to pay for classroom renovations and modifications necessary to
meet code requirements, laboratory renovations and the installation
of improved utility systems.
1996: The annual percentage increase was reduced
to 5.5% while centrally allocated spending was adjusted upward by
approximately $6 million. These funds were used to create a new
renovation fund to augment the University's regular major maintenance
program, with a particular emphasis on dormitory renovations.
1999: The annual percentage increase was reduced
to its current level of 5% while centrally allocated spending was
adjusted upward by approximately $14 million. $11 million were used
immediately for major maintenance and renovation, to help move toward
a goal of budgeting 2% of the replacement value of the physical
plant each year for these purposes. The remaining $3 million were
designated for eventual use for these purposes, but were available
in the interim to help meet the phase-in costs of new financial
aid policies adopted the previous year and the operating costs of
several new facilities, including the Frist Campus Center, as they
came on line.
2001: This year's adjustment leaves the annual
percentage increase at 5% but increases centrally allocated spending
by approximately $41 million, which will be used to provide increased
support for graduate education, undergraduate financial aid, new
educational initiatives and building construction and renovation.
|