The humble abalone, a marine mollusk and delicacy, builds a strong
shell from unspectacular materials: calcium carbonate and protein. By
tying thin layers of calcium carbonate -- which in another form makes
chalk -- together with a protein, the abalone builds a laminate that is
strong and durable.
The structure of abalone shell was elucidated by biologists, but a
decade ago it attracted the attention of Ilhan A. Aksay, a professor of
chemical engineering and an expert in the processing of ceramics, who was
then at the University of Washington. Over the years, he has been funded
by the U.S. Army to develop lightweight armor and has made and patented
some ceramic-metal composites. (A boron-carbide/aluminum composite that
Aksay helped develop was used on U.S. military vehicles in Bosnia.) When
he learned about abalone shell he thought, "Why not make such composites
laminated?" He and his coworkers did, and patented a laminated version of
the boron-carbide/aluminum material that is 25 percent stronger than the
unlaminated version.
Aksay is one of a number of Princeton
scientists and engineers who are studying the tricks of abalone and other
animals and plants to fabricate new materials with properties that improve
on other man-made materials. Princeton's materials scientists do not, it
should be emphasized, want to recreate abalone shell in the lab. If we
just did that, says Professor of Chemistry John T. "Jay" Groves, "we would
only have a clam shell." Instead, more than a half-dozen Princeton
researchers from almost as many departments are trying to understand the
processes that living things use to create the materials of life, and then
to adapt these processes for improving man-made materials. "If we learn
the rules," says Groves, "we can make anything."
Ilhan Aksay, left, and Jay Groves:
materials scientists taking inspiration from biology.
Groves and Aksay are learning the rules as members of the Princeton
Materials Institute. Started in 1990, PMI is the university's attempt to
unify the materials sciences at a time when some are predicting that an
Age of Materials is at hand.
Princeton does not have a materials-science department and in some
sense can be said not to have any materials scientists, either. At least,
not in the conventional sense of scientists who have earned degrees in
materials science. Princeton never seriously considered starting a
department of materials science, preferring instead to promote interaction
of scientists in existing departments. PMI is a hybrid between a
department and a center. It occupies its own modern building -- Bowen Hall
-- on Prospect Avenue, on the same block as the Engineering Quadrangle. In
that way, it is a bit like a department. PMI can also make joint
appointments of faculty, also department-like. But in serving as a
gathering place for faculty from many departments interested in materials
science, and in providing a home for expensive equipment to be shared, PMI
operates like a center. Moreover, students cannot earn degrees from PMI.
Undergraduates may earn a certificate. Graduate students do
materials-related research with an affiliated faculty member, but get
their degree from their professor's department.
ONE TOUGH MOLLUSK
The key to the abalone shell's toughness, according to Aksay, is in the
details of its structure, which has been worked out over the last few
years by researchers at Princeton, the University of California at Santa
Barbara, and elsewhere. Magnified 300,000 times with an electron
microscope, the shell looks like a brick wall, with calcium carbonate
"bricks" alternating with a protein "mortar." Despite the essentially
brittle nature of the calcium carbonate, the shell is extremely strong and
less brittle than man-made ceramics, due to its laminated structure. That
lamination helps prevent cracks from propagating, in somewhat the same way
that a braided rope does not fail when one strand breaks.
Aksay is an enthusiastic proponent of "biomimetics" -- looking to
biology for inspiration for new materials and materials-processing
techniques. "When people ask me if I needed to study biological systems to
invent laminated ceramic-metal composites," he says, "I tell them, no, I
might have come up with the idea anyway, but studying biological systems
helped get me there faster."
Biomimetics is a fertile area in materials science today, and a
strength of PMI. Aksay became interested in the field more than a decade
ago, when he read a book by Duke University zoologist Stephen Wainwright
and others titled Mechanical Design in Organisms. About the same
time, he and colleagues were working on ways to make materials that looked
-- microscopically -- like abalone shell. They never intended to simply
duplicate the shell material, since they could start off with much better
raw materials than calcium carbonate. "Just because we mimic nature,
doesn't mean we make materials exactly the same way," he says.
In an interview in his Bowen Hall office, Aksay reveals a
straightforward motivation for much of his work: "The excitement of making
a new material is a driving force for my research." And a material, to
Aksay, is something you can make gadgets out of, something you can get
your hands around. Materials can range from crystals, with very precise
and ordered structures, to amorphous solids such as glass, to liquids with
some ordered structure called liquid crystals.
If Aksay's office and nearby laboratory were a material, they would be
a crystalline solid, so neat and ordered are their contents. In a typical
scientist's office, journals and papers are strewn about, often
obliterating any glimpse of the desk. Aksay's are in square stacks. Books
and notebooks on his shelves line up with micrometer precision. Meanwhile,
Aksay is trying to make materials in which he controls the structure down
to the nanoscale. (Nanoscale refers to dimensions from roughly one
nanometer to one micrometer. A nanometer is one-billionth of a meter; a
micrometer, or micron, is one-millionth of a meter. At the scale modern
materials scientists work, 100-micrometer-thick human hairs are like the
cables of a suspension bridge.)
There are two paths to capturing the nanoscale, says Aksay. One can
essentially carve out of a hard material a structure on a tiny scale. For
example, an experimental technique known as e-beam lithography uses beams
of energetic electrons to make a pattern in a hard substrate, rendering
possible computer chips that are 100 times smaller than current commercial
versions. But what about working with soft materials, as nature does?
Materials scientists are in fact looking to living things for more than
just materials to model -- they would also like to adapt the assembly
process that nature uses, known as "self assembly." Simply put, the
building blocks of living things -- organic molecules -- come together on
their own, with some direction from genes, and form bonds that lead
eventually to biological structures. The entire process of development,
from a fertilized egg or seed to an adult organism, is self-assembly.
RUNNING A FILM IN REVERSE
"Amazing," is chemist Groves's reaction to such examples of
self-assembly and development as a seed growing into a tree. "It
works," he says, "because a seed contains all the information in itself
for how to make molecules, which then arrange themselves. That's what we
mean by self-assembly."
In the course of several interviews in his comfortable office in the
chemistry department -- which, though neat, is distinctly less orderly
than Aksay's: call it a liquid crystal -- Groves returned again and again
to a building analogy. When people erect a building, he says, they first
make the bricks, then a laborer arranges the bricks, slathering on mortar
as he goes. But nature has no builder, says Groves. Instead, nature's way
of making a building looks more like a film of an explosive demolition run
in reverse, with rubble rising up miraculously to form a building. "Nature
doesn't build brick by brick, it just erects," he says.
One biological material that has drawn Groves's attention, as well as
that of several other Princeton materials scientists, is the biological
membrane. Found around all cells and also around the cell's nucleus and
many organelles within the cell, biological membranes are not just a
single material, but a class of similarly constructed materials. The
typical membrane, introduced early in a general biology course when the
topic turns to cells, is a double layer of lipids with protein molecules
floating among the lipid chains. Each lipid molecule in the membrane has
two ends, one that is hydrophobic (water-hating) and one that is
hydrophilic (water-loving). When exposed to water, or watery fluid between
and within cells, the lipids spontaneously form structures that are stable
energetically, with their hydrophilic heads facing the water and
hydrophobic tails facing each other in the interior of the membrane. (This
"hydrophobic effect" was recognized and named by Professor Emeritus
Walter Kauzmann of the chemistry department.) In other words, lipid
bilayers self-assemble.
CREATION WITH A SMALL "C"
Groves and his team of 15 postdoc toral fellows, graduate students, and
un dergraduates work in a large, well-equipped laboratory to understand
how biological membranes are made and to build materials similar to them.
Groves emphasizes that he approaches materials science from the science
rather than the engineering end of things. Unlike Aksay, he is not
motivated by visions of an end product. Nevertheless, the process of
science for Groves includes both discovery and creation. Discovery, he
says, involves trying to determine "not only what nature has done in
detail, but also what are the general strategies that nature has
evolved." Once he has discovered what nature has wrought, Groves muses
about building "one of those things myself. That's creation with a very
small 'c'."
He and his students are at work on a half-dozen or more projects, all
sharing a common intellectual framework: understanding and orchestrating
complex molecular interactions and associations. "Can we create
large-scale organized structures using the processes that cells use?" he
asks. The answer to this question is clearly yes. And while Groves is
motivated by basic curiosity, much of his work has potential applications.
For example, he has studied structures that might be substitutes for
conventional imaging agents used in the medical diagnostic test called
MRI, or magnetic resonance imaging. Now, patients getting an MRI are
loaded up with several grams of a heavy metal to allow the device to
create a picture of soft tissue. Because heavy metals are poisonous and
may not all wash out of the body, medical technologists wonder how to make
imaging agents without heavy metals. Iron might be a good substitute,
since the body already uses it and has evolved mechanisms to deal with it.
Furthermore, tiny magnets, just a few nanometers in diameter, might be
sufficient. If scientists could encase such tiny magnets in a membrane,
they might make good imaging agents. Some bacteria have already done the
job, growing magnets -- in the form of magnetite, a magnetized iron used
in compasses -- in tiny sacs, or vesicles, inside their single-celled
bodies. (They use the magnetite to tell up from down in the soil.
Transplant northern-hemisphere bacteria to the southern hemisphere and
they go in the opposite direction.)
Groves's lab has produced such sacs and grown magnetite crystals inside
them. Because they are made of phospholipid membranes, the sacs ought not
to cause an immune response in a recipient. Furthermore, if some sacs
broke and released their iron, it would simply be a tiny addition to a
person's natural store of iron. The sacs are so tiny, Groves says, that
when added to a glass of water they don't cloud it up at all.
Groves acknowledges that "we're a ways from putting them in a person."
Animal studies are needed first. Such experiments, followed by clinical
trials perhaps, are for others to worry about; Groves is satisfied with
the opportunity to test his understanding of membrane structure and
function. He is concerned that applications not be oversold. "You have to
sell science on its intrinsic value," he says, "not sell individual
solutions, in part because such solutions may be years off and in part
because it creates a narrow-mindedness of thought."
Princeton's official entry into the materials sciences coincides with a
flourishing of interest in the field and the development of new analytical
techniques. The field is hot and the reason, says Groves, is that "until
now, we have focused on what is -- such as the structure of wood,
or of a tooth -- and now we are asking about putting together things that
nature has not thought of." There is no intrinsic boundary to this
process. Presented with a goal, materials scientists use their knowledge
of synthetic and biological materials to try to meet it.
Billy Goodman '80, a science writer who lives in Montclair, New
Jersey, wrote about the Department of Molecular Biology in the February 9,
1994 PAW.